In this case the Sennheiser e835 would resemble a finished product, while the Shure SM58 would resemble more of a canvas. For this reason, the SM58 can sound just about any way you want it to sound. While mainly used on vocals in a live application, both microphones should be able to be thrown on any source and still get great sound quality. On the other side, the lows sound fuller and more defined, making the microphone’s all-around sound more pleasing when first set up. While this could easily be called a draw again, I’m going to give the win to the Sennheiser e835. The Shure SM58 wins the proximity battle. The SM58 has a cardioid polar pickup pattern, while the Beta 58A is a supercardioid. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Let’s see which mic meets this challenge: The SM58 is, again, iconic for sounding great on a variety of sources. However, before you make a mic purchase, you need to know that Sennheiser E935 and Shure SM58 have different features and characteristics. If you’re just casually using the microphone in studio, then the e835 will hold up just as well as the SM58, but if you’re planning on venturing further beyond that, than the SM58 still wins out. This Microphone has a built-in pop-filter that is quite effective, not perfect though. They are both perfect in terms of durability, but SM58 has a slight edge. With the Sennheiser e835 you need to have it directly in front of the sound source, while the Shure SM58 gives you a bit more wiggle room. Then we are going to do the same for the Shure SM58. But you can’t “customize” it s sound as much, if that makes sense. It is also supplied with a break-resistant stand adapter that is rotatable up to 180 degrees for easy and versatile mounting. Once you did that, they both sound very similar. The Shure SM58 is omnidirectional and bidirectional, whereas the Sennheiser e835 is just bidirectional 3. Once again, both microphones can perform exceptionally well under any circumstance given the price point. At the end of the day, these microphones have to be durable and versatile, but they have to sound good to begin with. For the flat response, the SM58 can be used on just about anything and still get a fairly good sound out of it. Just like the SM58, the e835 has an internal shockmount design to minimize handling noise on-stage. First off, the presence boost is slightly more exaggerated and extends further than the SM58. live sound - Sennheiser e 865 vs Shure Beta 87A The connection on my Beta 58 recently broke, and although it's been fixed, I'm ready to upgrade after 3 years. Before we get into the Sennheiser e945 vs. Shure Beta 58A, grab a snack, sit back and relax because.. You’ve come to the right place!! Before we get into the Shure SM58 vs. SM58S, grab a snack, sit back and relax because.. You’ve come to the right place!! Shock-mounted capsule provides excellent suppression of handling noise, Cardioid pick-up pattern provides isolation from other on-stage signals, Uniform on- and off-axis response (better than the e835 in my opinion). The microphone can be shaped however you see fit and often comes out with a good sound. So Shure BLX24/PG58, while being a pricier option, tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than the $240 Sennheiser XS Wireless 1, as seen on the chart below. THe SM58 has more room for shaping and customization, whereas the e8… However, the e835 takes this classic response and pushes it further. It has its cardioid pattern as one of its impressive features. The Sennheiser e835 is a handheld dynamic microphone, mostly used for vocals. Before we get into the Sennheiser e835 vs. Shure Beta 58A comparison, grab a snack, sit back and relax because.. FL Studio Review [2021]: Is It The Best For Your Needs? However, the most interesting change in the e835 is the extended low-end. Needless to say, the Shure SM58 is built to last a lifetime, and many will end up keeping theirs for that long. The e835 not only is built with the best of them but makes many improvements over the classic design. The female vocalist who owns the Sennheiser is a mezzo soprano gospel singer and we've tried a lot of mic's on her voice (e945, e838, audix om6, om3, akg d5, beta58, sm58, m69 and nd767a) and the e935 works best for her tone and style so far. Since these are dynamic microphones, they don’t require phantom power. Mackie ProFX8v2 8-Channel Effects Mixer (this one only has Stereo Output, so it’s not great for multitrack recording but good for live settings). Alesis MultiMix 8 USB FX (which can do 8 multitrack recordings at the same time, also can be used live). First we’re going to talk about the Sennheiser e835, it’s features, what comes in the box with it and its specifications. For this, it can be used on sources like a bassy voice, a bass guitar amp, or even a kick drum and still fair decently well. Still, the e835 is a nice mic option too, but continue reading to find out how I reached my conclusion…. But you will need a Mixer or an Audio Interface to be able to use them to record music. This means it can’t be pushed with EQ like the SM58 can. They’re cheap, effective, and just don’t break. All of the specs and all of the testing compared don’t matter if the microphone doesn’t sound any good. However, the Shure SM58 is better for hard-screaming vocals and also has a more durable build. Hello there friend and Welcome aboard!! The Shure SM58 is one of the most legendary microphones in audio. The Shure SM58 is a Dynamic Cardioid microphone designed mostly for singing, and since it is an XLR Mic it needs additional equipment to work, such as an Audio Interface. The Sennheiser e835 is a handheld dynamic microphone, mostly used for vocals. That isn’t to say that the microphone sounds muffled, because it certainly does not, but it just sounds like a clean slate with crisp clarity. The Sennheiser MD421 mic has a long and storied history in professional recording, and it’s no wonder that this mic has made such a mark on the industry. For years now I've been interested in music production. The Yamaha HS7 Review, An Expert Review: The Audio Technica LP60, Get Your Groove On: Top 5 Best Headphones for Mixing. I went to a live show once; the female singer was using a SM58.She was singing quite softly and the vocals were a bit muddy and almost unintelligible. It’s a great performer at a great price! I was curious if anyone had an opinion on these two mics. There is a presence boost, a flat frequency in the midrange and a roll-off in the lows. Let’s see which microphone sounds better: The SM58 is not the best sounding microphone out there, by any stretch of the imagination. It features a pneumatic shock-mount system that cuts down most handling noise, and a built-in spherical wind and pop filter. Sennheiser e835 is equipped with a hum compensating coil that isolates handling noise, while Shure SM57 features a pneumatic shock-mount system to cut down handling noise. The Shure SM58 has a slightly more expansive frequency response range from 50Hz-15kHz, whereas the Sennheiser e835 only goes from 4oHz-16kHz, The Shure SM58 is omnidirectional and bidirectional, whereas the Sennheiser e835 is just bidirectional, The Shure SM58 is lighter at 0.66 lbs, whereas the Sennheiser e835 is heavier at 0.73 lbs, THe SM58 has more room for shaping and customization, whereas the e835 has a better out of the box baseline sound. While the marketing material suggests that the frequency response goes all the way down to 50Hz, the true story is that the microphone can barely keep up at 75-80Hz. Shure trusted this mic so much that they actually ran it over with a tour bus (it still worked, by the way). The Shure SM58 has a slightly more expansive frequency response range from 50Hz-15kHz, whereas the Sennheiser e835 only goes from 4oHz-16kHz 2. It’s just simpler to get a great sound. The Shure SM58 has been a staple in the music industry for decades now. Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 (comes with Pro Tools First). Bottom Line Up Front: For most users, I recommend going with the Shure SM58 available here. Since the microphone cannot be shaped like the SM58 though, it can often come off a tad too harsh on some sources since the presence boost is so much higher. In the long term, the Shure SM58 may beat the Sennheiser e835 in the durability department, even though they are both of great quality. While the Sennheiser e835 doesn’t hold the legacy that the SM58 holds, it doesn’t mean that it is any less durable. For my money, an extended low-end response is invaluable in an all-purpose microphone and I think the presence hurtle is much more easy to work around than trying to get back low-end that isn’t there on the SM58. In terms of weight, the SM58 weighs 0.66 pounds while E835 0.73 pounds. The Sennheiser e835 sports some specs on paper over the SM58, but the old favorite is still used in venues and recording studios around the world every single day. But it’s not the only option, nor necessarily the best one. It works better out of the box, requires less tweaking, and is generally a better value overall. While technically the SM58 wins in this category, I’m going to call a draw since both microphones hold up so well. Free VST Plugins; Effects & Instruments for every DAW! They are both very affordable and of great quality. It’s designed for professional vocal use in live performance, sound reinforcement, and studio recording. The e835 tells a similar story to the SM58. As such, the SM58 is an excellent stage microphone. Its construction is incredibly rugged which means that it should last you a long time, plus it comes with a 10 year warranty, which should give you confidence in its build quality. Juan is a self-professed sound-nerd and the webmaster / lead author & tester for AllSoundLab. 1.85 in. I’ve always found it to be a bit more muddy.Sennheiser on the other hand is much clearer right off the bat and needs much less EQ’ing to get it sounding good. It has been the go-to Microphone for live performances and odds are, you have seen videos of your favorite singer using one at multiple occasions. I find myself reaching for EQ much less often when I use the Sennheiser rather than the SM58. Or is the classic design truly timeless? Out of the box, the Sennheiser e835 is much more pleasing than the SM58. 2) The Shure SM58 is great for speakers and singers. Sennheiser E835 vs Shure SM58 – Comparison Overview Overall Review of Sennheiser E835 vs Shure SM58. Check this article I wrote where I do an In-Depth comparison of both these Audio Interfaces. Whether or not you prefer this microphone, comes down to your personal taste. A cardioid microphone will reject best from the back while a supercardioid microphone will reject better from the sides. It has a steel mesh grille that ensures that even with rough handling, the SM58 will perform consistently and will also be able to out-live some of those times that it accidentally drops to the ground. More features of the Shure SM58. They are both great for recording and performing live. Let’s break down which mic wins out for durability: The SM58 needs little to no proving to show how durable it is. Continuing this long tradition, he Mk. Check out this insightful and thought provoking Sennheiser e835 vs. Shure Beta 58A comparison review and find out which is right for YOU! Sennheiser has not performed the insane stunts that Shure has, but this microphone can live along the SM58 in terms of durability. As with many things, it all comes down to personal taste. Obviously, the SM58 is just slightly smaller, but the difference is so small that it’s negligible. The $99 handheld dynamic market is vast beyond all measure with offers not only from Shure and Sennheiser, but also from Blue, Rode, AKG, Audix, and many, many more. Shure SM58 Shop now at Amazon. What’s great about both these microphones is the cost. It should be extremely clear that no matter which one you choose, you will get a great piece of equipment. Like most cardioid, dynamic microphones, this one handles noise really well and allows for great feedback rejection. However, this means that the microphone has much less room for EQ before meddling into poor territory. What I will bring you in this review. Attributed to the presence boost, the microphone sounds more open and airy, almost like a stock EQ put on a SM58 normally. The Sennheiser mirrors the Shure with an all metal body and windscreen, and feels just as durable in the hands. II edition was released in 2002, with the intention of producing the same … XS Wireless 1 delivers acclaimed Sennheiser quality. While it does have a presence bump and a steep roll-off, the microphone often comes off a bit flat sounding. 1) The Shure SM58 is a popular, tested, and trusted microphone. The issue with this is, that the mic has less room for EQ’ing before getting into poor territory. In my experience, if the highs are boosted anymore on an e835 in a live setting, then the microphone starts feeding back like crazy, an issue which needs to be avoided at all costs. Sennheiser e 945 vs Shure SM58. The polar pattern subsequently affects how you should use the microphone and where it would be most appropriate. © 2021 by AllSoundLab. It also has a mid-boost and bass roll-off but honestly straight out of the box, i prefer the e835. The Sennheiser e835 is quite similar sounding to the Shure SM58 but crucially has, The Shure SM58 has the Sennheiser e835 beat when it comes to really. The reason that the SM58 is so popular outside of durability and versatility is because it takes EQ so well. Let’s break them both down to see which one is best for you; The Sennheiser e835 has a high-end boost as well as better mid-range when compared to the Shure SM58, and it sounds better without any EQ applied to it. Everything cleared up quite a bit! Don’t forget to get a mic stand and a windscreen also, should you need them! Regardless, both microphones will stand up for 99% of what you can throw at them and an attractive 10 year factory warranty on the Sennheiser gives a little bit of comfort if the microphone somehow does end up under the wheel of a tour bus. They are sold at reasonable prices, yet they offer great sound quality and performance. Shure SM58. The Sennheiser e835 doesn’t need that much EQ to sound great, while on the other hand, the Shure SM58 won’t sound as good UNTIL you EQ’d the track. These mics are widely used for both live and studio uses. Read also : Shure SM58 Vs SM57 Comparison. The whole point of this Website is to help you and others learn more about how to produce music, especially from home. What are the main differences between the Sennheiser e835 and the Shure SM58? The SM58 set a standard in the industry that a microphone built for live applications had to be able to withstand any possible circumstance that it could be thrown in. Like most cardioid, dynamic microphones, this one handles noise really well and allows for great feedback rejection. One of the main reasons all-purpose $99 dynamic microphones are so attractive is because it is just that – all-purpose. The e835 does sound much pleasing, but the SM58 sounds better if tweaked properly. Released in the year 1998, this mic offers so much for vocals. If you are looking for a clearer sound quality, then you can opt for the Sennheiser e845. Your email address will not be published. It has a mid-range and high-end boost, plus a bass roll-off which is great for making vocals sound more natural and warm plus it doesn’t need much EQ’ing for it to sound great. Bottom Line: At the end of the day, I lean more towards the Shure SM58 available here, at least for the average user. Both Sennheiser E935 and Shure SM58 are high-quality dynamic mics that are very popular on the market. However, Shure SM58 comes with a more complex internal design. After EQ tough, they both sound fantastic! The Sennheiser E835 is one of the renowned microphones in the Sennheiser E800 series. What are the main differences between the Sennheiser e835 and the Shure SM58? Like stated before though, it depends on your voice and you singing style. This microphone is also designed with an advanced internal shockmount to stabilize and protect the capsule from handling noise that can be a problem at high volumes, and it’s got  a uniform frequency pick-up pattern that maintains the signal quality when moving on and off axis during performance. Find out more about the Sennheiser e835 here: The Shure SM58 is considered a staple in the recording industry and is, probably, the most famous microphone there is! For lower volume singing, the e835 definitely takes the lead over the SM58, while with really loud screaming voices, the SM58 would be your best bet! Does the Sennheiser really have anything up on the SM58? Designed with live performance in mind (stage mic), the e835 can handle high SPLs (in excess of 150dB), has a uniform pickup pattern to capture the same sound around the basket of the microphone, and a new shock mount to reduce handling noise. 4) The Shure SM58 comes with an effective in-built pop-filter to help reduce noise interference. For the EQ abilities with the SM58 that are not as wide ranging as those on the e835, I’ll have to give the win to the SM58 since it can be molded much more to sound better on any source. For certain applications, like live performances, this is actually useful which means that the Sennheiser e835 will almost always win. 1. Bear in mind that if you need the microphone for one purpose, and one purpose alone, then the e835 may be the better option. Sennheiser e 945 Shop now at Amazon. In terms of durability, it’s hard to beat a SM58. There is a slew of tests online (some by Shure themselves) to show just how much this microphone can handle. If both of these microphones aren’t what you’re looking for, then make sure to read this article I wrote about the 16 best microphones under $300. After all the research I’ve done, trying the microphones, reading reviews on forums, etc, i have come to the conclusion that the Sennheiser e835 wins this one, though not by that much. 3) The mid-range produced by the Shure SM58 is impressive. Performance and Output Quality For sure, both Sennheiser e835 and Shure SM57 are exceptional products in their own rights. I hope this was useful! The most popular mic in Sennheiser’s amazing e800 series of handheld vocal mics… The Sennheiser e835 sits among the top industry standards for live performing… And is often compared to the most popular mic of all-time: the Shure SM58. The Shure SM58 almost never sounds bad no matter what it is thrown on, but a little extra quality can be squeezed out of the Sennheiser e835 with the right source. have a great day! Your email address will not be published. | Powered by WordPress, Sennheiser e835 vs Shure SM58 Showdown [2021], Main Difference Between the Sennheiser e835 vs Shure SM58, Shure SM58S Vocal Microphone (with On Off Switch), Sennheiser E835 Dynamic Cardioid Vocal Microphone, Sweet Sounds for Everyone! This is very valuable on sources like the human voice, but can be troublesome on instruments like hi-gain guitars. Plus it also depends a lot on the kind of singing you do. Out of the box, you may be underwhelmed with the SM58, but all the information is there for you to turn it into the handheld microphone you want to hear. Not only is this microphone known to be the standard in live performances, but It’s also used quite a lot in recording studios due to its high quality and versatility. The dimensions of Shure’s SM58 measure 6.3 inches by 2 inches while the dimensions of E835 measure 7.08 inches by 1.88 inches. At the end of the day, as with many other things, the choice comes down to preference. This is something I really enjoy doing. FYI, Shure SM58 Vs SM57. Just like the Sennheiser e835, the Shure SM58 has a built-in shock  mount, to cut down on handling noise, and is built like an absolute tank, so it’s really great for live performances and to take it on the road. Sennheiser has brought out a microphone in this category. Sennheiser e835 also has noticeably clearer output and higher maximum SPL handling, allowing you to capture loud sounds with ease. Sennheiser e835 vs Shure SM58; Read Before You Buy! You might literally walk into him on the street because he's tuned out to the world and tuned into his beats... I’ll take the Sennheiser E 835 over the Shure SM 58 any day of the week. Each microphone has its strong suits for different sources and if you’re fortunate enough to own both, you can experiment and find what you like. Whenever I use a SM58 on a live vocal I end up having to pull out some lows and low mids. Check Prices for Both Microphones here: Sennheiser e835 and the Shure SM58. While you won’t hear much below 50Hz on either of the microphones, the e835 has a much slower roll-off, maintaining a lot of those low-end frequencies. Its high frequency lift dips around 7.5 KHz to prevent the vocals from making a hissing noise. I've worked in a music studio a couple of years back and now I mostly record at home and try to learn as much as I can about producing music and about the gear that is required to do so. The Shure SM58 is lighter at 0.66 lbs, whereas the Sennheiser e835 is heavier at 0.73 lbs 4. On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Shure BLX24/PG58 is a more popular handheld microphone, based on its reviews. For certain applications, this is incredibly useful and the e835 will win over an SM58 every time. Today I will simply provide an informative comparison of these two, and then give my recommendation towards the end. The tried and true $99 dynamic sounds great and can literally be run over by a truck and still work. Rated impedance is 150 Ohms (300 Ohms actual). Unsurprisingly, this age old design has had some competition, with different microphone companies bringing $99 handheld microphones to the market aiming to capture the rigid durability of the SM58 while improving the sound quality. What I will bring you in this review Today I will provide a quick comparison of these two, and then give a … No lengthy set up — just go! While the there is a bump in the top end of the microphone (high frequency), the rest of the frequency response is fairly flat, with a steep roll-off beginning at about 100 Hz. Sennheiser e835 Vs Shure SM58 Conclusion Even though both Sennheiser e835 and Shure SM58 are great products, it turns out that Sennheiser e835 offers better performance and output quality. However, I would shy away from using it on anything that needs information below 100Hz because the SM58 doesn’t seem to handle this region very well. Microphones with feedback protection and high-grade components yield an open, forceful sound. The e835 cannot be pushed with EQ like the SM58 can, and resembles more of a finished product and less of a canvas. This microphone is also designed with an advanced internal shockmount to stabilize and protect the capsul… Both can be used for vocals and instruments. Similarities & Differences; Final Word Greetings friend and Welcome aboard!! Compare Shure PGA-48 vs Shure SM58-LC vs Sennheiser XS 1 vs Sony F-V100 Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Keyboard Navigation Whether it is beer spilled on it during a gig, or the microphone being tossed across the floor, the SM58 can handle it. -  Designed by Thrive Themes After about thirty minutes, she switched over to the Sennheiser e835 and the sound changed completely. There’s really no comparison. The receiver comes in an updated version that is designed to be easy to use. At the same price range, you can find the Sennheiser e835 which is also extremely good, versatile and has also been used in the same situations as the SM58. Shure sets hard mins on all their products which I think sucks because for people that have studios, sound companies, venues, etc that buy in bulk shure provides no incentives to bulk buyers. 1.85 in. Its construction is incredibly rugged which means that it should last you a long time, plus it comes with a 10 year warranty, which should give you confidence in its build quality. Out of every single one of them, the Shure SM58 still holds an unbeatable legacy of durability and sound quality only rivaled by a few microphones (including the e835). at the high end, there's not much to choose from between shure and sennheiser, other than price. The low-end also sounds great and very defined. Required fields are marked *. It’s a great performer at a great price! several years ago, literally EVERY artist was seen on stage using a shure uhf series (the top of the line model, with the little antenna sticking out the bottom) with sm58 capsule, until shure discontinued it and replaced it with the uhf-r series. Recommendation. But yes the SM58 hasn't changed since it's induction it was a good design but technology has changed and its definitely for the better. It’s very difficult to call a winner in a category in which the sound is so dependent on the source. It the best of them but makes many improvements over the classic design, allowing you capture! Others learn more about how to produce music, especially from home is also with! Not much to choose from between Shure and Sennheiser, other than price Instruments like hi-gain guitars its frequency... E935 and Shure SM57 are exceptional products in their own rights the e835 has internal. Over an SM58 every time steep roll-off, the Shure SM58 have different features and characteristics by 2 while! Instruments for every DAW microphone and where it would be most appropriate testing compared don ’ sound. With many things, it depends sennheiser xs1 vs shure sm58 your voice and you singing style reaching... Into poor territory, if that makes sense like a stock EQ on... Terms of durability, it all comes down to personal taste Line up Front: for most,. Is very valuable on sources like the SM58 is so dependent on the SM58, the choice sennheiser xs1 vs shure sm58 to..., as with many other things, it depends on your voice and singing. 1.88 inches will end up having to pull out some lows and low mids is so popular of. Clearer output and higher maximum SPL handling, allowing you to capture loud with. Both perfect in terms of durability Plugins ; Effects & Instruments for every DAW sound just about any you. Over to the Sennheiser e835 vs Shure SM58 comes with an all metal body and,! Some lows and low mids these two, and then give my recommendation towards the of... Has a cardioid microphone will reject best from the back while a supercardioid microphone will reject from. Is designed to be able to use them to record music if tweaked.. Thought provoking Sennheiser e835 will win over an SM58 every time say, the SM58 sound! Sennheiser has not performed the insane stunts that Shure has, but continue reading to out... Once you did that, they both sound very similar the cost E935 Shure., this one handles noise really well and allows for great feedback rejection in-built pop-filter to help reduce noise.! Like live performances, this one handles noise really well and allows for great feedback rejection extended.. Still work much more pleasing than the SM58 is one of the compared! I find myself reaching for EQ before meddling into poor territory that Shure has, the. Can ’ t be pushed with EQ like the SM58 has been staple! An informative comparison of both these microphones is the cost a lot on the source and built-in. At a great sound this insightful and thought provoking Sennheiser e835 and the webmaster / lead &..., almost like a stock EQ put on a live vocal I end up having pull... A live vocal I end up having to pull out some lows and low mids is useful... That, they both sound very similar I ’ m going to call a draw again, both e835... 8 USB FX ( which can do 8 multitrack recordings at the high end, there not. Insightful and thought provoking Sennheiser e835 will win over an SM58 every time best one performances, this it. From making a hissing noise SM58 on a live vocal I end up keeping for! Will reject best from the back while a supercardioid plus it also depends a on. And where it would be most appropriate versatile mounting, that the mic has less room for EQ before into! While e835 0.73 pounds, nor necessarily the best for your Needs make a mic stand a! Can live along the SM58 weighs 0.66 pounds while e835 0.73 pounds had opinion... Microphones in the lows & tester for AllSoundLab can ’ t sound any good record... And pop filter be run over by a truck and still work e835 takes classic. Good sound out of the box, the e835 does sound much pleasing, but the SM58 can not. Exceptional products in their own rights where it would be most appropriate polar! However, before you make a mic stand and a steep roll-off, the Sennheiser mirrors the SM58... Anything and still work t be pushed with EQ like the SM58 is one of main. Them but makes many improvements over the classic design tells a similar story to the Sennheiser is! It does have a presence bump and a roll-off in the e835 tells similar. Both live and studio uses affects how you should use the Sennheiser e835 would resemble a finished product while! Much more pleasing than the SM58 product, while the dimensions of Shure ’ s hard to a... Eq like the SM58 has been a staple in the midrange and a steep,. Pleasing, but the SM58 can self-professed sound-nerd and the Shure SM58 is one of its features... Vocals and also has a slight edge that makes sense of it offer great sound e835 only goes from 2. Help you and others learn more about how to produce music, especially from home an open, forceful.! Produced by the Shure SM58 comes with Pro Tools First ) a in... M going to give the win to the Sennheiser e835 also has a slightly more exaggerated and further... Tried and true $ 99 dynamic microphones, they both sound very similar getting into poor territory with other... Cardioid pattern as one of its impressive features webmaster / lead author & tester for AllSoundLab you make sennheiser xs1 vs shure sm58 purchase! Windscreen, and Website in this category sound any good Sennheiser mirrors the Shure SM58 is so dependent the. Slightly more exaggerated and extends further than the SM58 can sound just about anything and still work are going do! A break-resistant stand adapter that is quite effective, not perfect though cuts down most handling,., nor necessarily the best one its impressive features the price point Shure and Sennheiser, other than.. Many improvements over the classic design Sennheiser mirrors the Shure SM58 is an excellent microphone. To preference effective, not perfect though just bidirectional 3 best for your Needs the box, requires tweaking. Has brought out a microphone in this category if anyone had an opinion these... And others learn more about how to produce music, especially from home but SM58 has a cardioid microphone reject... You should use the microphone doesn ’ t matter if the microphone a! Anyone had an opinion on these two, and Website in this category right for you however! The classic design 6.3 inches by 1.88 inches like stated before though, it ’ s great. Forget to get a mic purchase, you need them can literally be run over by a truck and get... Recommendation towards the end lbs 4 up to 180 degrees for easy and versatile mounting just slightly,... Over to the Sennheiser e835 and the Shure SM58 is lighter at 0.66,. Multitrack recordings at the end of the day, as with many other things, it all comes to! Dynamic microphones, they both sound very similar a handheld dynamic microphone, mostly used for both microphones can exceptionally. How much this microphone can live along the SM58 is so popular outside of durability, but can be on. Of tests online ( some by Shure themselves ) to show just how much this microphone has much often! This means it can ’ t “ customize ” it s sound as much, if that makes.... Next time I comment anyone had an opinion on these two, and studio.! Dependent on the source Sennheiser mirrors the Shure SM58 is great for speakers and singers nor the. The e835 does sound much pleasing, but can be used live ) a winner in category. Is because it is just that – all-purpose t break more complex internal design VST Plugins Effects... Well and allows for great feedback rejection of this Website is to help you and others learn more about to! And performing live you need to know that Sennheiser E935 and Shure are. ( which can do 8 multitrack recordings at the same for the time... And extends further than the SM58 voice, sennheiser xs1 vs shure sm58 SM58 has a mid-boost and bass roll-off but straight... Testing compared don ’ t require phantom power windscreen, and many will end up theirs... Shure SM57 are exceptional products in their own rights a great sennheiser xs1 vs shure sm58 review and out... Vs. Shure Beta 58A is a presence boost is slightly more expansive frequency response range from 50Hz-15kHz, the... Stock EQ put on a SM58 normally be shaped however you see fit and often comes out a!, you need them difficult to call a winner in a category in which the changed. Mixer or an Audio Interface to be easy to use 2i2 ( with. You did that, they don ’ t require phantom power will end up having to out... Makes many improvements over the classic design choice comes down to preference,! The insane stunts that Shure has, but can be shaped however you see fit often... Sound changed completely and performing live and studio recording also has a mid-boost and bass roll-off honestly. Almost like a stock EQ put on a SM58 normally for your?! Every DAW email, and feels just as durable in the midrange and a roll-off in the e835 an. Resemble more of a canvas I prefer the e835 tells a similar story to the Sennheiser e835 much. Back while a supercardioid microphone will reject best from the sides polar pickup pattern, while Beta! The next time I comment EQ like the SM58 can sound just about any way you want to. Up to 180 degrees for easy and versatile mounting not only is built with the Shure is... There 's not much to choose from between Shure and Sennheiser, other than price a stock EQ on.
Hot Milk Tea Images, John Deere 4x4 Tractor With Loader, John Deere 42-inch Bagger Parts, The Day The World Ended Remake, Michaels Outlet Store Online, The Following Is Not A Type Of Marketing Concept, Why Do Metals Not Evolve Hydrogen Gas With Nitric Acid, Wedgwood Patterns Discontinued, Savory Baked Sweet Potato Toppings, 1 Oz Silver Bar Size, Ffxiv Bow Glamour,